Acceptance Criteria

« Back to Glossary Index

Acceptance criteria (AC) means a collection of predefined requirements that a software product needs to fulfill to be admitted by the end-user. They define the characteristic behavior from the end-user perspective and are different for every user story. Skillfully written acceptance criteria guarantee that all users are satisfied with what they get and avoid unexpected outcomes at the end of a developing stage. The related AC must be established before the development team starts working on a specific user story. If not, there is a fair chance the deliverables will not satisfy the customer’s expectations and requirements.

Acceptance Criteria

Acceptance criteria explain the foreseen outcomes of a user story in a compact way. It also provides QA and developers a precise method to discover whether a story is “made.” Product managers need to combine these requirements into their process for several reasoning. When product manager specifies their required result before development starts, they assist in shared understanding and promoting alignment. That understanding assists in decreasing the possibility of shocks below the line. Further, more assisting product bodies to manage and set expectations, acceptance criteria too essential for developers. The added context produces a prominent defense against scope creep and reduces doubtfulness.

What are the main objectives of Acceptance Criteria?

Following are the main objectives of acceptance criteria.

More detailed feature scope: Acceptance Criteria describe the boundary of a user story. They give accurate specifications on functionality which assist the team members in understanding works as expected and whether the story is done.

Explaining adverse outlines:  Acceptance criteria may need to block a user from proceeding further if it identifies insecure password input. When a user behaves unexpectedly or does invalid inputs, an adverse scenario will occur. Acceptance criteria explain how the system must react to these scenarios which are described.

Establishing communication: AC adjusts the visions of the client and development team. They assure that everybody has a basic knowledge of the demands: Developers understand precisely what action the feature needs to express. In contrast, the client and stakeholders understand what is demanded from the feature.

Directing feature evaluations: AC defines what must be generated by the team members. Team members can break user stories into tasks that can be accurately determined once they have precise requirements.

As various people can have different solution ideas regarding one problem, building a concentrated vision of implementing the functionality is necessary.

Features of a Good Acceptance Criteria

Verdict

AC is a vital part of each user story on which an energetic team works. It clearly defines the desired outcomes, scope, and testing standards for pieces of functionality on which the delivery team is working. Designing and agreeing on AC itself is also a priceless communication opportunity b/w products and developers. Please do not ignore the AC as they are approachable and straightforward, solve various obstacles at once. They document customer expectations, clarify requirements, prevent ambiguity, provide an end-user perspective, and eventually improve QA tests if the development goals were reached. It is harder to sneak it in midway through if a demand is not set and defined at the start of a sprint. Ultimately, acceptance criteria usually determine whether a user story is finished.

Scroll to top